The connection between U.S. marketing communications and intellectual/economic oppression

Behold the newspaper kiosk in front of the Diamond Center (which, by the way, is quite Jewish) in midtown Manhattan.

China Daily USA is a Chinese newspaper, printed in English, about the U.S.- China business and trade relationship.

Now let’s look at the newspaper El Especialito in kiosks all over Washington Heights/Upper Manhattan (neighborhoods represented by a strong Dominican population, both legal and illegal).

What does this tell you?  That while the elite Jewish community (selling Diamonds) in NYC (a city run by Jews) is interested in international commerce and trade, Americans living in immigrant ghettos have to contend with local papers, written in Spanish, that heavily advertise a*s-augmentation, bigger breasts, and smaller waists (among other targeted propaganda).  This plastic surgery ad is virtually obscene.  Judging by the full-page size of the ad (which costs additional money to reserve) this is where the big business is for those preying off of the vanity of Afro-Carribean Latinos and the insecurities of American women.

So, while Jews use money to invest and trade, internationally, Americans must contend with immigrant newspapers, they can’t even read, telling the local community where to place their money:  in the hands of doctors that can re-sculpt their body.  If you want to buy the New York Times to read news in English, well, the New York Times is a very Jewish paper and it costs about four dollars. This is how the global elite dumb-down the population so that they are the ones in charge of big business (both at home and abroad) while Americans are the ones reading what is offered to them to find out which movie to see, which bar to drink at, which book to buy, which club to purchase a membership to, and where to go to get an as*-lift- in short:  where to spend their hard earned money.

This is intellectual oppression that favors the global elite.  Their aim is to dumb down the public and fuel a lifestyle of consumerism– because the house always wins, both at home and abroad.

America: The mainstream interpretation of events only serves to fuel the status quo

If we raise tariffs on imports from China, the U.S. economy and consumer power as we know it will be doomed, as per the MSM.  Well, that depends if you see the cup as half-full or half empty.

For starters, big production companies that make and sell reknowned products would be the main victims of higher tariffs on Chinese goods- not necessarily American citizens.

1.  Taking manufactering power away from the private sector brand giants, would create opportunity for everyday Americans to produce items for their own use.  How, can this be accomplished?  By turning to the value of recycling.  For example:  turning those worn t-shirts into headbands; turning plastic bottles into decorative flower art; using cardboard to create interior decorations; using wood planks to create your own table or shelf; or using your sewing machine to make your own skirt.
2. Citizens with a talent for creating and producing products would then have more selling power as the competition will grow to meet consumer demands.  This opens the path for higher quality goods coming from small but quality custom design studios.  The potential for new interpersonal relationships increases as citizens turn to each other to meet their consumer needs- not to a giant chain stores.
3. China has already moved on to bigger fish to fry these days.  They are harnessing their power to innovate technology- they don’t have to manufacture toys for 99 cent stores anymore to stay alive as a nation
4. In China’s place would be new providers (countries) willing to accept the opportunity to sell products to the massively populated American market.  The products may be different, the quality may be different, but it wouldn’t be the end of the world.
5. Turning away from a consumer crazed American mentality would reduce the amount of garbage humans introduce to the environment on a massive, daily, basis.  That would be a positive development for the environment and for animals.

As you can see, change in this sector, would not be a bad thing.  Above all, humans are adaptable creatures and I doubt that a shift in present day conusmer patterns would necessarily spell doom.  This is, however, a perfect example of how the MSM protects its main stream sponsors.

To read the MSM article, click here:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/with-trump-tariffs-on-china-consumers-likely-to-take-a-hit/ar-BBKzJ1B

To read about how the amount of garbage pouring into the environment is growing exponentially, click here:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/science/2018/03/22/great-pacific-garbage-patch-grows/446405002/